Product · Plan
Product Discovery Opportunity Scorecard
Discovery dies in docs without a shared score. Rate problem clarity, evidence, solution fit, market timing, and feasibility — get Speculative-to-Conviction levels and a 90-day discovery plan.
Free product discovery scorecard and opportunity assessment tool. Ten questions for PM reviews — go, hold, or deepen — before you commit a build cycle.
Built for Product · Design · Eng · Founders
- Answers stored in your browser until you optionally email a copy
- Plain-language result you can paste into a board or CFO brief
- Directional guidance — validate with a scoped pilot before budget lock
How it works
- Work through one question at a time — pick the option that matches how things work today, not your wish list.
- Get an instant maturity level (1–5) plus dimension scores.
- Share results with risk, platform, or transformation leads; unlock Print / Save as PDF with a work email when ready.
What this tool is for
Discovery work often dies in docs. Teams debate opinions without a shared score for problem clarity, evidence strength, solution fit, market timing, and feasibility — so weak opportunities consume build cycles.
Who it’s for: Product managers, design and eng leads, and founders who need a go / hold / deepen signal before committing a discovery sprint or build cycle.
What you get
- Overall opportunity level from Speculative to Conviction-grade
- Dimension scores for problem, evidence, solution, market, and feasibility
- A 90-day discovery plan that targets your weakest evidence gaps first
AI Assessment Engine analyzes answers with transparent scoring heuristics in your browser — no data leaves the device for scoring.
How scoring works
Each answer scores 1–5. Dimension scores average within that theme. Overall level = rounded average across all questions (Level 1–5).
- 1Lower scores mark gaps for the 90-day plan.
- 2Dimension bars show whether risk concentrates (e.g. security vs strategy).
- 3Planning aid only — not a certification or regulatory attestation.
- 4Score evidence you can show (interviews, workarounds, data) — not pitch-deck confidence.
- 5Low evidence or feasibility often should gate build even when the problem feels obvious.
- 6Re-run after a discovery cycle to see whether the opportunity moved toward conviction-grade.
AI Assessment Engine analyzes answers with transparent scoring heuristics in your browser — no data leaves the device for scoring.
Vatsal Shah
AI Leader · Solution Architect · TPM
https://shahvatsal.com
Discovery Scorecard — results summary
Prepared via shahvatsal.com/tools/product-discovery-opportunity-scorecard
Directional planning aid from transparent heuristics — not a certification, audit, or delivery commitment. Validate with a scoped pilot. © Vatsal Shah — shahvatsal.com
Key terms
- Opportunity score
- A structured rating of how validated a product opportunity is across problem, evidence, solution, market, and feasibility.
- Problem clarity
- How precisely you can name who has the pain, what friction occurs, and what it costs — without vague "better" language.
- Workaround signal
- Users already paying, waiting, or cobbling a fix — strong proof the problem is real.
- TAM / SAM
- Total and serviceable addressable market — sizing that should be bottoms-up when possible, not only analyst top-down.
- Conviction-grade
- Multi-source validation strong enough to fund with normal investment discipline and clear go/no-go criteria.
FAQ
What is a product discovery opportunity scorecard?
A shared scoring tool that rates one opportunity on problem clarity, evidence, solution fit, market/timing, and feasibility — so PM reviews debate evidence, not opinions.
How should we use the go / hold / kill signal?
Levels map to action: Speculative/Emerging → deepen discovery or kill; Validated → prototype carefully; Compelling/Conviction-grade → fund with normal discipline. The page plan spells next steps per level.
Should sales anecdotes count as strong evidence?
They are a start (Level 2-ish) but weaker than structured interviews, behavioral data, and paid workarounds. Score the strongest evidence you actually hold.
Can eng and product fill this out together?
Yes — especially feasibility and solution-fit questions. Joint scoring surfaces dependency and skill gaps before a build commitment.
Does the AI Assessment Engine send our answers to a server?
No. Scoring runs in your browser with transparent heuristics. Optional work email only unlocks Print / Save as PDF and follow-up resources.
Is this the same as prioritization (RICE / WSJF)?
No. This scores opportunity quality and discovery readiness for one idea. Prioritization calculators rank a backlog of already-accepted opportunities.
What if we score high on problem but low on feasibility?
Treat feasibility as a gate: validate data, API, and regulatory dependencies before staffing a large build. The 90-day plan for mid-levels targets those gaps first.